<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPv6 at home &#8211; a guide to getting started</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/</link>
	<description>A far off place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgroarke</title>
		<link>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/comment-page-1/#comment-3947</link>
		<dc:creator>sgroarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/#comment-3947</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve rather glossed over the whole question of DNS... Since we&#039;re choosing to not implement IPv6 DHCP server, how do clients machine pick up the DNS? Sure, they get the address prefix from RADVD, but what about anything else?

In the first instance all my client will be dual-stack IPv4 &amp; IPv6. They already have the IPv4 DNS known and active so we will let them continue to use that. Of course if IPv4 does one day disappear, and we run as single-stack IPv6, this would need to be addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve rather glossed over the whole question of DNS&#8230; Since we&#8217;re choosing to not implement IPv6 DHCP server, how do clients machine pick up the DNS? Sure, they get the address prefix from RADVD, but what about anything else?</p>
<p>In the first instance all my client will be dual-stack IPv4 &#038; IPv6. They already have the IPv4 DNS known and active so we will let them continue to use that. Of course if IPv4 does one day disappear, and we run as single-stack IPv6, this would need to be addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgroarke</title>
		<link>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/comment-page-1/#comment-3928</link>
		<dc:creator>sgroarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/#comment-3928</guid>
		<description>Once IPv6 is set up and working, prior to us becoming a fully-fledged router we need to enable &lt;i&gt;forwarding&lt;/i&gt;. This is covered, along with the problems it then brings, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/03/05/ipv6-and-default-routes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in this post here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once IPv6 is set up and working, prior to us becoming a fully-fledged router we need to enable <i>forwarding</i>. This is covered, along with the problems it then brings, <a href="http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/03/05/ipv6-and-default-routes" rel="nofollow">in this post here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgroarke</title>
		<link>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/comment-page-1/#comment-3927</link>
		<dc:creator>sgroarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/#comment-3927</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another article where I tackle the issue of IPv6 firewall logging: http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/25/231/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another article where I tackle the issue of IPv6 firewall logging: <a href="http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/25/231/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/25/231/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
