Comments on: IPv6 and default routes http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/03/05/ipv6-and-default-routes/ A far off place Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:15:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: sgroarke http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/03/05/ipv6-and-default-routes/comment-page-1/#comment-3966 sgroarke Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:23:10 +0000 http://www.ipsidixit.net/?p=233#comment-3966 Indeed!! To digress slightly: what my "getting IPv6 working on a home server" exercise has told me in no uncertain terms is that while it's true that the IPv6 stack has been around for years now, the integration of the elements to provide a working solution for home users is a long way from complete. The basic bricks are there, but a complete, smooth working solution for home users is absolutely not yet ready. I hope that my IPv6 articles are a small step in that direction. Indeed!! To digress slightly: what my “getting IPv6 working on a home server” exercise has told me in no uncertain terms is that while it’s true that the IPv6 stack has been around for years now, the integration of the elements to provide a working solution for home users is a long way from complete.

The basic bricks are there, but a complete, smooth working solution for home users is absolutely not yet ready. I hope that my IPv6 articles are a small step in that direction.

]]> By: digitalsushi http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/03/05/ipv6-and-default-routes/comment-page-1/#comment-3965 digitalsushi Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:32:54 +0000 http://www.ipsidixit.net/?p=233#comment-3965 Yeah but if the gateway randomly changes to another l2 address, that static assignment is invalid and you're offline. Yeah but if the gateway randomly changes to another l2 address, that static assignment is invalid and you’re offline.

]]>