<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ipsidixit.net &#187; radvd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipsidixit.net/tag/radvd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipsidixit.net</link>
	<description>A far off place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:28:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IPv6 at home &#8211; a guide to getting started</title>
		<link>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sgroarke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethernet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icmp6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ping6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With IPv6 slowly becoming more visible, it was time to get to grips with it. While absolutely not essential (yet!) it seemed like a fun idea: my ADSL provider offers native IPv6 in parallel with IPv4, and my hosting provider is running an IPv6 beta. So I can do native IPv6 end to end between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-227" style="margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px; margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;" title="IPv6 Logo" src="http://www.ipsidixit.net/wp-content/2010/02/IPv6-logo.png" alt="" width="100" height="60" /></strong></span></span></p>
<p>With IPv6 slowly becoming more visible, it was time to get to grips with it. While absolutely not essential (yet!) it seemed like a fun idea: my ADSL provider offers native IPv6 in parallel with IPv4, and my hosting provider is running an IPv6 beta. So I can do native IPv6 end to end between my home and a remote host. &#8220;Home&#8221; in this case consists of a Linux firewall running iptables, fronted by shorewall. Two ethernet ports: one to the ADSL modem (my &#8220;external&#8221; interface) and one to the house infrastructure (&#8220;internal&#8221;)</p>
<p>The Ubuntu server distribution in use is, like most Linux distros, fully IPv6 ready. For example, do an ifconfig and we see</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:40:63:f5:f9:3c </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet addr:88.XXX.XX.XXX  Bcast:88.178.87.255  Mask:255.255.255.0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 addr: fe80::240:63ff:fef5:f93c/64 Scope:Link</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> RX packets:14086899 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> TX packets:15607323 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> RX bytes:1837525573 (1.8 GB)  TX bytes:666354591 (666.3 MB)</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> Interrupt:16 Base address:0&#215;8000 </span></div>
<p>Now I may not know much about IPv6 on Linux yet, but I can see that I&#8217;ve got a line beginning &#8220;inet addr&#8221; which looks kinda IPv6-ish. Good start. Let&#8217;s go&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-228"></span></p>
<h1>IPv4 &#8211; today</h1>
<p>As it stands, my home firewall performs the following functions:</p>
<ul>
<li>It acts as a DHCP <em>client</em> on its <em>external</em> interface, in order to pick up from the ISP the IPv4 address, plus the DNS server(s) being offered. In fact my IPv4 address is fixed, so strictly speaking I don&#8217;t need to act as a DHCP client on this interface, but it&#8217;s no real effort to do so and it means I get the DNS servers automatically.</li>
<li>It acts as a DHCP <em>server</em> on its <em>internal</em> interface, in order to supply IP addresses to the many and various client devices within the house, along with DNS information. (I actually use <a id="cuqm" title="dnsmasq" href="http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html">dnsmasq</a> for this purpose &#8211; tremendous piece of software)</li>
<li>It performs NAT between the internal devices and the Internet, courtesy of <a id="e66t" title="iptables" href="http://www.netfilter.org/">iptables</a>.</li>
<li>It acts as a firewall between the internal devices and the Internet, again courtesy of iptables.</li>
</ul>
<p>Since no one in their right mind writes &#8220;raw&#8221; iptables configs of any complexity, I use <a id="rljr" title="shorewall" href="http://www.shorewall.net/"><span style="color: #000000;">shorewall</span></a> to administer the NAT and firewall functions &#8211; mostly using the shorewall cli, sometimes using the shorewall GUI within <a id="hk_w" title="Webmin" href="http://www.webmin.com/"><span style="color: #000000;">Webmin</span></a>.</p>
<p>To top things off, I also have a VPN tunnel running between the firewall and a host machine, using <a id="wr0b" title="OpenVPN" href="http://openvpn.net/"><span style="color: #000000;">OpenVPN</span></a>.</p>
<h1>So what do I need to know even <em>before</em> I think of starting with IPv6?</h1>
<p>So as far as I know all the raw elements are available to me: ISP support, host support and all the bit &#8216;n bobs that Linux offers. So how do I string them together? In fact, hang on a sec before that: Just what is my goal?? The engineer in me frankly just wants to have a damn good play with IPv6, but it&#8217;s still good to have an initial goal to provide some sort of framework and direction.</p>
<p>Hence I set myself the somewhat arbitrary goals as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>Between my firewall and my remote host enable simple IPv6 connectivity. ping, ssh, etc.</li>
<li>Between my firewall and my remote host enable VPN connectivity (i.e. shift the existing IPv4 tunnel to IPv6)</li>
<li>While leaving the rest of the household blissfully ignorant (and hence unaffected) by IPv6, enable two specific workstations (one Windows, one Linux) to have dual IPv4/IPv6 stacks such that they default to using IPv4 except for traffic destined to the remote host or some other IPv6 end-point, which will go IPv6 end-to-end (i.e. workstation &lt;&#8211;&gt; firewall &lt;&#8211;&gt; host)</li>
</ul>
<p>Note that there are a lot of things that I am not yet trying to do. Specifically I am not setting up any gateways to allow IPv4 &lt;&#8211;&gt; IPv6 inter-working. For now I will have all my existing IPv4 functionality, with an entirely optional layer of IPv6 for those clients who (a) can talk native IPv6 and (b) have an IPv6 end-point to which they wish to connect. The inter-working side of things is a level of complication that in the first instance I want to avoid. Start simple and build up.</p>
<h1>IPv6 Basics</h1>
<p>Before anything else there are some IPv6 &#8220;basics&#8221; that need a little explanation and clarification. As with any technology, the problem is not with finding information. The problem is with finding out which information is useful and which is entirely irrelevant.</p>
<h2>IPv6 Addresses</h2>
<p>The one thing everyone knows about IPv6 is that it&#8217;s got funny looking, and rather large, addresses. Where once we had stuff like good old 192.168.0.1, now I might have fe80::240:63ff:fef5:f93c/64. And that&#8217;s one of the shorter ones&#8230;!</p>
<p>So what do I really need to know about IPv6 addresses, leaving aside the stuff that&#8217;s not required? Here goes.</p>
<p>IPv6 addresses consist of 128 bits. Why? Simple: to provide enough addresses that we&#8217;re not likely to run out, as we are perilously close to doing with IPv4. Just how big is &#8220;128 bits&#8221;? In decimal terms, such numbers have up to 39 digits. Here&#8217;s one:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">340282366920938463463374607431768211455</pre>
<p>In order to make things more manageable, IPv6 addresses are not written as long, decimal numbers. Instead they are written in hexadecimal, broken up in to 16-bit fields by colons. Here&#8217;s an IPv6 address lifted from the official IPv6 HowTo:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">2001:0db8:0100:f101:0210:a4ff:fee3:9566</pre>
<p>To further simplify things, leading zeros can be omitted. Also, contiguous blocks of zeros can also be omitted. For example:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">2001:0db8:0100:f101:0000:0000:0000:0001</pre>
<p>can be reduced down to</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">2001:db8:100:f101::1</pre>
<p>The most extreme example of this is when the localhost address is considered (analogous to IPv4&#8242;s 127.0.0.1) and can be condensed down from</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001</pre>
<p>to</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">::1</pre>
<p>Note, however, that the use of &#8216;::&#8217; and leading-zero suppression is purely a shorthand. <em>All</em> IPv6 addresses are 128-bits in length &#8211; these are just cosmetic tricks to make the writing and typing of them a little more friendly.</p>
<p>Just as IPv4 addresses have netmasks, so with IPv6 addresses. More of that when we look specifically at routing later on.</p>
<p>Also, normally we find that the upper 64 bits are considered to be &#8220;network&#8221; bits and the lower 64 bits are &#8220;host&#8221; bits.</p>
<h3>Network bits</h3>
<p>The leading 16 bits of the network portion of an IPv6 address are &#8220;special&#8221; in so far as some values are reserved as having special meaning. I am not here going to define all the possible values in use. I am confining myself to what matters within the context of the exercise at hand. And for those purposes the two values might be seen.</p>
<h4>Local link addresses prefix</h4>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">fec</span><em><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">x</span></em> (where <em>x</em> is any hex digit, but is normally 0) &#8211; Such addresses are local link addresses. Under Linux, when an IPv6-capable interface is enabled, such an address &#8220;automatically&#8221; appears. It is used solely to talk with other devices on the same link: hi, anything there? anyone looking for a router? Note that such addresses are <em>not</em> used for &#8220;normal&#8221; data &#8211; they are purely for local link management. And now we know where that IPv6-looking address came from in my original <em>ifconfig</em> command:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">inet6 addr: fe80::240:63ff:fef5:f93c/64 Scope:Link</pre>
<p>(and notice that friendly Linux even puts the &#8220;Link&#8221; there to remind you that it&#8217;s a link address)</p>
<div>
<h4>Global unicast address prefix</h4>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">2</span><em><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">xxx</span></em> and <span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">3</span><em><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">xxx</span></em> &#8211; These are so-called &#8220;global unicast&#8221; addresses, analogous to IPv4 &#8220;normal&#8221; addresses (i.e. not private, not multicast, etc.)</p>
</div>
<h3>Host bits</h3>
<p>The bottom 64 bits of an IPv6 address are, essentially, whatever you want them to be. They can be manually defined or, more often, are computed by using the interfaces MAC address (if it has one).</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s a simple enough address:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">2001:0db8:100:f101::1</pre>
<p>Given the <span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">2001:</span>prefix, so we know it&#8217;s a global unicast address from an ISP. And the bottom 64 bits consists of just &#8217;1&#8242; (all the zeros are magic&#8217;ed away by the &#8216;::&#8217;)</p>
<p>But what of this &#8220;computed from the MAC address&#8221;? Recalling the ifconfig I showed back at the start:</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:40:63:f5:f9:3c </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet addr:88.XXX.XX.XXX  Bcast:88.178.87.255  Mask:255.255.255.0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 addr: fe80::240:63ff:fef5:f93c/64 Scope:Link</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> RX packets:14086899 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> TX packets:15607323 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> RX bytes:1837525573 (1.8 GB)  TX bytes:666354591 (666.3 MB)</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> Interrupt:16 Base address:0&#215;8000 </span></div>
<p>Note the hardware MAC address: 00:40:63:f5:f9:3c (and remember that those digits and colons are nothing at all to do with IPv6 notation &#8211; they are bog-standard, traditional L2 MAC address format)</p>
<div>
<p>Now look at the last part of the IPv6 link address: you will see that there is more than a passing resemblance between them &#8211; although also note that they are not identical either. The details of how one is morphed in to the other is not of direct concern to us &#8211; all we need to know here is that one follows from the other.</p>
<h3>A complete example</h3>
<p>Here&#8217;s one I prepared earlier&#8230;.. <img src='http://www.ipsidixit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  This is the output from <em>ifconfig</em> on my host system, after the main interface has been fully configured and all addresses allocated:</p>
</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:16:3e:2e:50:36 </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet addr:217.70.191.54  Bcast:217.70.191.255  Mask:255.255.252.0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 addr: fe80::216:3eff:fe2e:5036/64 Scope:Link</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 addr: 2001:4b98:41::d946:bf36:54/64 Scope:Global</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> RX packets:122352 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> TX packets:68714 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> RX bytes:34644771 (34.6 MB)  TX bytes:62489400 (62.4 MB)</span></div>
<p>What have we got? The interesting parts break down as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>The interface has a L2 MAC address of <span style="font-family: 'courier new';">00:16:3e:2e:50:36</span></li>
<li>The IPv4 addressing is as it always has been &#8211; No change there.</li>
<li>We have a Link address of <span style="font-family: 'courier new';">fe80::216:3eff:fe2e:5036</span> which should now look familiar: the <em>fe80:</em> prefix and the appearance of the L2 MAC address.</li>
<li>And we now have a Global address of <span style="font-family: 'courier new';">2001:4b98:41::d946:bf36:54</span> which is familiar at least in so much as it has a prefix of <em>2001:</em> The rest of the address&#8217;s derivation is not of direct concern here. (In fact, after the ISP-specific part, other elements of it are derived from VLAN addresses and other such stuff. No matter.)</li>
</ol>
<h2>Goodbye <em>ifconfig</em>, hello <em>ip</em></h2>
<p>Since time immemorial Linux users have been familiar with the command <em>ifconfig</em>. Thus far in this document I&#8217;ve used it too, for the sake of familiarity. But dear <em>ifconfig</em> has actually been deprecated now for many years. It lives on, and we all still use it, but with the advent of IPv6 it does now seem an appropriate moment to bid it goodbye. It&#8217;s time to use the <em>ip</em> command, in its many forms. While it&#8217;s true that <em>ifconfig</em> can still achieve <em>most</em> of what is required, it sometimes falls short. Also, using <em>ip</em> let&#8217;s us more clearly and easily distinguish between IPv4 and IPv6, which is maybe not a bad thing!</p>
<p>Compare the <em>ifconfig</em> output from above with a couple of examples of the <em>ip</em> command:</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>ip addr show dev eth0</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">2: eth0: &lt;BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP&gt; mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> link/ether 00:16:3e:2e:50:36 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet 217.70.191.54/22 brd 217.70.191.255 scope global eth0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 2001:4b98:41::d946:bf36:54/64 scope global </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 fe80::216:3eff:fe2e:5036/64 scope link </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever</span></div>
<p>This is analogous to the simple <em>ifconfig</em>: we&#8217;ve got L2 MAC, IPv4, and a couple of IPv6 addresses showing.</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>ip -4 addr show dev eth0</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">2: eth0: &lt;BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP&gt; mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN qlen 1000</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet 217.70.191.54/22 brd 217.70.191.255 scope global eth0</span></div>
<p>Look how much neater that is, even just for IPv4: no L2 MAC, no IPv6, just the IPv4-related information.</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>ip -6 addr show</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">1: lo: &lt;LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP&gt; mtu 16436 </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 ::1/128 scope host </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">2: eth0: &lt;BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP&gt; mtu 1500 qlen 1000</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 2001:4b98:41::d946:bf36:54/64 scope global </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 fe80::216:3eff:fe2e:5036/64 scope link </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever</span></div>
<p>And similarly here: we just get IPv6-related information, and nothing else.</p>
<div>It may take a little effort to get used to it, but it&#8217;s worth the effort. And feel free to make use of <em>alias</em> to make life even easier. If you tire of typing <em>-6</em> after each invocation of IP, then do something like:</div>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">alias ip6=&#8217;ip -6&#8242;</span></p>
<p>and then you can just enter:</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">ip6 addr show</span></div>
<p>which is quite neat.</p>
<h2>Key subsystems</h2>
<p>The last part of this <em>IPv6 Basics</em> section is to introduce the functional building blocks within Linux which seem to get mentioned in connection with IPv6.</p>
<p>We now know about IPv6 addresses types that matter to us, we have met the command(s) we will use to inspect and manipulate things such as interfaces, routes and so on. We have also assumed that there is something similar to IPv4 <em>iptables </em>(and we&#8217;ll come back to that in some detail later as to how we actually use <em>iptables</em> under IPv6). However what subsystems such as DHCP exist and are of interest to us? When reading up on IPv6 Linux implementation one comes across the following mentioned frequently, and you may quickly form the impression that they are three important elements in an IPv6 firewall/router. They are:</p>
<ul>
<li>dhcp6c</li>
<li>dhcp6s</li>
<li>radvd</li>
</ul>
<h3>dhcp6c</h3>
<p>dhcp6c is a Linux DHCP IPv6 client. It is directly comparable to the IPv4 dhclient or dhclient3. It will, for a nominated interface, call out and ask for an IPv6 address which it can allocate to that interface. It may also, optionally, pick up other information, typically DNS-related.</p>
<h3>dhcp6s</h3>
<p>dhcp6s is a Linux DHCP IPv6 server. It is comparable to the IPv4 dhcpd or, in my network, dnsmasq. Just as in the IPv4 environment, it hands out addresses to other devices and, optionally, other information such as DNS data.</p>
<h3>radvd</h3>
<p>radvd is a Router Advertisement Daemon. This is less easy to directly compare to the IPv4 environment. It can hand out, to requesting devices, an IPv6 prefix (not a full address&#8230;) and a default route to be used. From this the receiving device can then automatically decide upon a host portion to add to the prefix to give it a full IPv6 address. So at first sight, it seems to be a rather inadequate imitation of a DHCP server!</p>
<p>One might very easily conclude that all three are required. After all, we may well use a DHCP client on the Internet side, and a DHCP server for the private network sounds pretty much essential. And a router advertisement daemon? Not entirely sure what it is, but gets a lot of mentions so I probably need that too! In actual fact the only one of these you are likely to need is readvd. You might need any combination of them, depending upon your precise circumstances. But probably not.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><br />
</span></p>
<h2>DHCP client I get, but what&#8217;s with DHCP server <em>versus</em> radvd?</h2>
<p>This is an area of considerable confusion! When bouncing around Google trying to find information on setting up IPv6 one minute we appear to be required to use DHCP server, the next minute we appear to need radvd. Which is which and when do I use them? Do I need both?</p>
<p>Well, the answer to the last question, &#8220;Do I need both of them?&#8221;, it &#8220;Probably not, but you might&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Coming from familiarity with the world of IPv4 one instinctively tends to feel comfortable with the concept of dhcp6s &#8211; and while it can be used, radvd may well be simpler and easier in practice. Or, maybe, both&#8230; The attraction of rad is that the server does not need to concern itself with any state: no records of addresses allocated &#8211; since it dos not allocate any. It just says &#8220;Hey, this is the prefix, work the rest out for yourelf.&#8221; which is attractively simple! The DHCP server alternative has to remember which address is where and when. The case where you might want both would be where you want to have rad handle the job of initiating address allocation, and then have DHCP pick up to add some icing on the cake: DNS information being the common case.</p>
<p>And us here? We&#8217;re going to go with the simpler case, and have radvd handle the job of responding to IPv6-capable devices within our internal network and tell them just enough to allocate addresses themselves and use a default route.</p>
<p>So it actually seems to come down to a pair of subsystems being required:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>dhcp6c</em> talks out to the ISP to handle &#8220;outside&#8221; IPv6 addressing.</li>
<li><em>radvd</em> talks internally to all devices to handle &#8220;inside&#8221; IPv6 addressing.</li>
</ul>
<p>Well, maybe&#8230; But in these early days of IPv6 there is far from a standard view of how these things are to work. And, as I discovered, your ISP may not actually themselves offer an IPv6 DHCP server at all! In my case that was the situation, although I have little doubt that as time progresses and IPv6 implementations mature such services will become more standard.</p>
<p>But for now, my implementation will be reduced down to simply running radvd on the firewall, with the IPv6 configuration on Internet side being handled semi-statically.</p>
<p>Just one subsystem to be used: radvd. No DHCP client. No DHCP server. Who said IPv6 was complicated?!?</p>
<h1>Setting up the firewall box</h1>
<p>So at last we get to the actual practicalities of getting IPv6 up and running on the home firewall. The system in question is a Ubuntu-based device. The differences for another Linux system should be fairly negligible (package names maybe, some config file locations, etc.)</p>
<h2>Packages to install</h2>
<p>All we need to install is radvd if its not already present. Under Ubuntu something like:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">sudo apt-get install radvd</pre>
<p>should do the job.</p>
<h2>Careful now&#8230;.</h2>
<p>And already we come to potentially our first issue!!! Once radvd is up and running on the firewall it will, potentially, start chatting to devices on the home network which are, by default, on the look out for IPv6 routers. Whether it does this by default depends upon the installed configuration file used, and which interface points where, but it&#8217;s a real possibility. And that may not be entirely a good thing. Be on the look out for workstations suddenly getting really really slow when, for example, browsing the web. I would suggest disabling IPv6 on any devices which may be susceptible to it. There are numerous ways to do that. On Windows in all its flavours? I have not the faintest idea. Under Linux? <a id="b2v8" title="Here are some suggestions" href="http://www.ubuntugeek.com/how-to-disable-ipv6-in-ubuntu.html"><span style="color: #000000;">Here are some suggestions</span></a>. Depending upon what is on your home network this may not be required, but if you do run in to the &#8220;slow web&#8221; issue, be alert to it.</p>
<p>Technical note: for the curious, if you do hit the IPv6 crawl of death issue, it&#8217;s actually due to certain services on clients stations being IPv6 aware and thus trying to resolve DNS requests via IPv6. They try, take an age to fail, and eventually fall back to IPv4. But it&#8217;s ugly. I wish I could say that I foresaw the issue and planned accordingly. More truthful would be to say that during my diddling around with radvd I got loud complaints from another user on the home network&#8230; <img src='http://www.ipsidixit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h2>Setting up the connection towards the Internet&#8230; no hang on, actually not yet&#8230;</h2>
<p>The first task is to get the public (in my case eth0) interface up and running IPv6. Before actually doing that we need to pause for a moment and consider the implications of what might happen if we indeed succeed in bringing up the IPv6 ISP-connected interface! We are then wide-open to the world, and just asking to be attacked. The only sensible thing to do is to first set up an IPv6 firewall to provide some level of protection before we throw ourselves open.</p>
<p>Sorry. But that&#8217;s life. Of course if your public-side connection is already protected via some firewall, then you can skip this. But it probably isn&#8217;t, so pay attention. With IPv4 most home networks make use of, by necessity, NAT. While not done for reasons of security it does nonetheless provide as a side-effect a modest level of security in so far as it tends to block unsolicited incoming connections. So even with a poorly configured firewall under IPv4, the use of NAT hides a multitude of nasties from us. But in the brave new world of IPv6 one hugely important difference from IPv4, but one that everyone seems to gloss over, is that NAT is not required. And indeed since not required, it does not exist. All IPv6 devices on the &#8220;inside&#8221; network will have, in effect, public addresses. No port-forwarding, no NAT, none of that. And while that&#8217;s actually a very refreshing thing in general (NAT and large firewalls are a real pain) it does means we can no longer rely on the default level of safety that NAT provides. A tightly configured firewall is absolutely essential.</p>
<p>To drive IPv6 <em>iptables</em> I use <em>shorewall6</em>. I highly recommend it. Here I am going to run through, without too much explanation, the steps to set up a very basic &#8220;block almost everything except a bit of stuff for testing&#8221; IPv6 firewall on the system. Here goes.</p>
<p>Install the package:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">apt-get install shorewall6</pre>
<p>The basic level of configuration then has to take place. Navigate to the configuration files:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">cd /etc/shorewall6/</pre>
<p>Set up the following files in a similar manner as shown here:</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">interfaces</span></strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">ext     eth0     -</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">int     eth1     -</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">zones</span></strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">int     ipv6</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">ext     ipv6</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">fwall   firewall </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>policy</strong></span></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">#Source  Dest    Policy     Log     Burst/Limit</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">fwall     all     DROP</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">int       all     DROP</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">ext       all     DROP</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">all       all     DROP</span></div>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>rules</strong></span><br />
# Allow only ping &#8211; for testing<br />
</span></p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">ACCEPT     ext     fwall     ipv6-icmp</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">ACCEPT     fwall     ext     ipv6-icmp</span></div>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><br />
Within <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>shorewall6.conf</strong></span> ensure these lines as as follows:<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
STARTUP_ENABLED=Yes<br />
.<br />
.<br />
.<br />
IP_FORWARDING=Keep<br />
</span></p>
<p>What we have there is a minimal firewall configuration, which blocks absolutely everything except pings to and from the firewall box itself.</p>
<p>Start up the firewall with e.g.:</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">/etc/init.d/shorewall6 start</pre>
<p>And then</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">shorewall6 show config</pre>
<p>should give you a pretty lengthy IPv6 <em>iptables</em> config.</p>
<p>So, with precautions now in place, we may proceed.</p>
<p>[EDIT: shorewall6 and logging may or may not be an issue... See my article here: <a href="http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/25/231/">http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/25/231/</a>]</p>
<h2>OK, <em>finally</em> setting up the connection towards the Internet&#8230;</h2>
<p>Here is the starting point, with an automatically assigned, MAC-derived, link address:</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>ip6 add show dev eth0</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">2: eth0: &lt;BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP&gt; mtu 1500 qlen 1000</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 fe80::240:63ff:fef5:f93c/64 scope link </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forev</span>er</div>
<h2>Configuring the addressing</h2>
<p>My ISP is free.fr (a French ISP) From them I have a fixed IPv4 address and a fixed IPv6 address. My IPv6 address prefix is 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0::/64 which looks pretty random but of course is not.</p>
<p>The part <em>2a01:e3</em> is, from previous knowledge, a global unicast prefix (the <em>2xxx:</em> indicates that) and the full form <em>2a01:e3</em> is the RIPE-allocated prefix used by Free. The next part, <em>58 b2 57 ea</em>? Well, I write is deliberately in that format to show that it breaks down to (decimal): 88 178 87 234. This, by no coincidence at all, is my current IPv4 address! Of course Free mapping subscribers&#8217; IPv4 addresses into their IPv6 prefix is entirely arbitrary on their part. It indeed seems like a good idea, but is absolutely not required. In the future, for example, IPv4 addresses will not be used in the first place, so no such mapping would be possible.</p>
<p>Of course their network prefix is, as per standard IPv6, 64 bits in length. So the second 64 bits (the host portion) is entirely mine to use as I see fit. That is a seriously large amount of address space, all <em>globally</em> routable, and all entirely mine to use as I wish.</p>
<p>Since my ISP themselves run radvd (or some equivalent) on their routers, when everything is IPv6 enabled on my firewall system, the Internet-facing interface, eth0, should automatically pick up the required prefix and use it. However in addition to the ISP-prefix + MAC-derived host portion I also want a simplified address on the interface. It&#8217;s absolutely not required, but I want it to make my life slightly easier.</p>
<p>So prior to the reboot I edit</p>
<pre style="padding-left: 30px;">/etc/network/interfaces</pre>
<p>and add a section as follows:</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">iface eth0 inet6 static</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> address 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0::1</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> netmask 64</span></div>
<p>With this I am specifying that <em>in addition</em> to any automatic address the interface picks up, I also want to statically assign a PREFIX+::1 address to the interface.</p>
<p>After the boot I inspect the results and see:</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>ip6 addr show dev eth0</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">2: eth0: &lt;BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP&gt; mtu 1500 qlen 1000</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0:240:63ff:fef5:f93c/64 scope global dynamic </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> valid_lft 86369sec preferred_lft 86369sec</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0::1/64 scope global tentative </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> inet6 fe80::240:63ff:fef5:f93c/64 scope link </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever</span></div>
<p>Excellent! We see the <em>link</em> address that was there previously. And now we have two <em>global</em> addresses. The one marked <em>dynamic</em> which is clearly the MAC-derived address (notice how the prefix is as expected &#8211; this was picked up not from any of our config but from a remotely received router advertisement from the ISP) and the one marked <em>tentative</em> which is as manually configured by me.</p>
<h2>Testing</h2>
<p>When we set up the shorewall6 firewall, everything was marked as blocked except for ipv6-icmp. Ostensibly this was to permit what we are about to do now, a ping test, which makes use of ICMP. However it was also in the knowledge that the Router Advertisements which we picked up from the ISP, and which gave us the prefix to be used for the dynamic address, are also, coincidentally, ICMP6. Two birds with one stone: we allow pings to go in and out, and also allow IPv6 Router Advertisements to pass unhindered.</p>
<p>So, to test our interface, let&#8217;s try something:</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>ping6 ipv6.google.com</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">PING ipv6.google.com(2a00:1450:8006::69) 56 data bytes</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">64 bytes from 2a00:1450:8006::69: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=39.4 ms</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">64 bytes from 2a00:1450:8006::69: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=38.4 ms</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">64 bytes from 2a00:1450:8006::69: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=35.6 ms</span></div>
<p>It works!!</p>
<p>Which is great, but where&#8217;s the routing and so forth that is being used here? Let&#8217;s look at that too:</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>ip6 neigh show</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">fe80::207:cbff:fea5:1a68 dev eth0 lladdr 00:07:cb:a5:1a:68 router REACHABLE</span></div>
<p>That&#8217;s kind of like our IPv4 ARP table: where is, in Layer 2 terms, the next hop? And we see it at the given link address, with a corresponding MAC address, and a marker of REACHABLE. That REACHABLE can change as entries get set up and then age out, and values such as DELAY or STALE might also be seen.</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>ip6 route show</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> </span><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0::/64 dev eth0  proto kernel  metric 256  expires 85889sec mtu 1480 advmss 1420 hoplimit 0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> </span><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">fe80::/64 dev eth1  proto kernel  metric 256  mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> </span><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">fe80::/64 dev eth0  proto kernel  metric 256  mtu 1480 advmss 1420 hoplimit 0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> </span><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">default via fe80::207:cbff:fea5:1a68 dev eth0  proto kernel  metric 1024  expires 1283sec mtu 1480 advmss 1420 hoplimit 64</span></div>
<p>Note that the default route is, automatically, via the adjacent router we learned about from the router advertisement.</p>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>ip6 monitor</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">192.168.0.3 dev eth1 lladdr 00:18:8b:86:f3:52 STALE</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">ff02::1:fff5:f93c via ff02::1:fff5:f93c dev eth0  metric 0 </span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"> cache  mtu 1480 advmss 1420 hoplimit 0</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">fe80::207:cbff:fea5:1a68 dev eth0 lladdr 00:07:cb:a5:1a:68 router REACHABLE</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">192.168.0.3 dev eth1 lladdr 00:18:8b:86:f3:52 STALE</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">fe80::207:cbff:fea5:1a68 dev eth0 lladdr 00:07:cb:a5:1a:68 router STALE</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">.</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">.</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">.</span></div>
<div>The <em>monitor</em> command is quite interesting. It shows the significant state changes as they occur. Here we can see IPv4 ARP entries aging out, and IPv6 neighbors becoming active and then stale.</div>
<div>And of course to really shine a light on what&#8217;s happening, we could do something like:</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';"><strong>tcpdump ip6 -i eth0</strong></span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">&#8230;</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">16:00:58.856832 IP6 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0:240:63ff:fef5:f93c &gt; 2a00:1450:8006::6a: ICMP6, echo request, seq 1, length 64</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">16:00:58.897135 IP6 fe80::207:cbff:fea5:1a68 &gt; ff02::1:fff5:f93c: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who has 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0:240:63ff:fef5:f93c, length 32</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">16:00:58.897305 IP6 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0:240:63ff:fef5:f93c &gt; fe80::207:cbff:fea5:1a68: ICMP6, neighbor advertisement, tgt is 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0:240:63ff:fef5:f93c, length 32</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">16:00:58.897664 IP6 2a00:1450:8006::6a &gt; 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0:240:63ff:fef5:f93c: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 1, length 64</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">16:00:59.856858 IP6 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0:240:63ff:fef5:f93c &gt; 2a00:1450:8006::6a: ICMP6, echo request, seq 2, length 64</span></div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New';">16:00:59.892915 IP6 2a00:1450:8006::6a &gt; 2a01:e35:8b25:7ea0:240:63ff:fef5:f93c: ICMP6, echo reply, seq 2, length 64</span></div>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">.<br />
.<br />
.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">So at this point we now know that we have basic IPv6 connectivity in and out of the firewall.</p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<p>What we&#8217;ve done here, after a quick recap of IPv6 addressing techniques, is to:</p>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Enable a default &#8220;block almost everything&#8221; IPv6 firewall.</li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Understand the three major subsystems which might b used on an IPv6 router/firewall (<em>dhcp6c, dhcp6s, radvd</em>)</li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Understand that we possibly only need <em>radvd</em> and to install it on the firewall.</li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Assign an automatic address to our Internet-facing interface, based upon a received router advertsiement.</li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Assign a static address to the same interface, in addition to the automatic address.</li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">See how we can examine IPv6 information relating to interfaces, route tables and neighbours.</li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Monitor IPv6 activity for troubleshooting purposes.</li>
<li style="padding-left: 30px;">Do a simple ping test to confirm that we have basic IPv6 connectivity from the firewall out to the IPv6-Internet.</li>
<p>In the next part I will look at extending IPv6 inside the private network, and examining options for moving the VPN to a native IPv6 implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2010/02/24/228/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
