<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ipsidixit.net &#187; Site News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipsidixit.net/tag/stite-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipsidixit.net</link>
	<description>A far off place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 06:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>lighttpd</title>
		<link>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2009/07/22/lighttpd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2009/07/22/lighttpd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sgroarke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FPage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipsidixit.net/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This site now runs on lighttpd! Apache2 was used previously. It&#8217; a fine web-server, but lighttpd is so much, er, lighter. About 30% lower memory consumption for the same performance. Also, as a side benefit, the config is simpler too.</p> <p>It does, for me at least, everything Apache2 can do:</p> Multiple virtual hosts HTTPS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-152" style="margin: 10px 50px;" title="lighttpd_logo" src="http://www.ipsidixit.net/wp-content/2009/07/light_logo_170px.png" alt="lighttpd_logo" width="143" height="142" />This site now runs on <a href="http://www.lighttpd.net/" target="_blank">lighttpd</a>! Apache2 was used previously. It&#8217; a fine web-server, but lighttpd is so much, er, lighter. About 30% lower memory consumption for the same performance. Also, as a side benefit, the config is simpler too.</p>
<p>It does, for me at least, everything Apache2 can do:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<ul>
<li>
<ul>
<li>Multiple virtual hosts</li>
<li>HTTPS</li>
<li>WebDav (both unencrypted and SSL encrypted)</li>
<li>PHP (and fast too!)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>The only limitation I have is the very same one I also had with Apache2: HTTPS only fully works for one on the virtual hosts. If you host <em>a.com</em>, <em>b.com</em> and <em>c.com</em> then you can only have a certificate active for one of them with the correct identify. Say you have a certificate for <em>a.com</em>: if you visit <em>https:/b.com</em> you&#8217;ll get a warning that the certificate is only valid for <em>a.com</em>. Of course you can choose to override this and still encrypt the session, but it&#8217;s a nuisance. Must be something very fundamental to SSL, given that both Apache and lighttpd have this issue.</p>
<p>So, lighttpd comes highly recommended!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ipsidixit.net/2009/07/22/lighttpd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

